Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon warned that oil prices sustained above $90 a barrel risk driving inflation higher and shifting consumer behavior in the second half of 2026.
Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon warned that oil prices sustained above $90 a barrel risk driving inflation higher and shifting consumer behavior in the second half of 2026.

Goldman Sachs Chief Executive Officer David Solomon warned that oil prices sustained above $90 a barrel risk driving inflation higher and shifting consumer behavior in the second half of 2026, adding to signs that demand destruction is spreading beyond jet fuel and petrochemicals.
"If oil prices remain elevated, we could see a meaningful change in consumer spending patterns in the second half of the year," Solomon said Tuesday, without specifying a threshold or timeline for the shift.
Brent crude traded near $93.90 a barrel Monday, down about 20% from its late-March peak but still well above pre-conflict levels. Goldman Sachs forecasts Brent to average $90 in the fourth quarter, though the bank's analysts said actual end-use demand may have fallen more than expected in response to higher prices. U.S. regular gasoline averaged $4.475 a gallon on May 18, up $1.315 from a year ago, while diesel reached $5.523, a $2.036 increase, according to the Energy Information Administration.
The warning from Solomon — the first time Goldman's CEO has directly tied oil prices to consumer behavior — signals that the bank sees the risk of a broader economic slowdown if crude remains elevated through the summer driving season. The International Energy Agency projects global oil demand will contract by 420,000 barrels a day for 2026 as a whole, 1.3 million barrels a day weaker than its pre-war forecast.
Demand destruction is already visible in Asia and Europe
Goldman's own analysts documented the early signs of demand erosion in a note published Sunday. China's retail sales volume for gasoline and related products fell more than 20% in April from a year earlier, directionally consistent with weaker refiner sales, lower highway traffic, and growth in subway ridership and electric-vehicle charging, the bank said. Western Europe showed similar weakness, with retail car-fuel sales volumes declining an average of 8% year over year in April.
The demand response has been sharper than Goldman initially expected. The bank's analysts cited three factors: structurally higher switching opportunities from EVs and urban transit in China, work-from-home technology in developed markets, and the perception that the largest oil supply shock ever is likely temporary, which may encourage consumers to delay travel and companies to postpone petrochemical production rather than absorb higher costs.
Chevron Chief Executive Officer Mike Wirth offered a more urgent supply-side assessment at the Bernstein 42nd Annual Strategic Decisions Conference on May 28, warning that oil inventories are being drawn down rapidly and that price pressures will intensify in June and July. U.S. commercial crude inventories fell 3.3 million barrels in the week ending May 22 to 441.7 million barrels, about 2% below the five-year average, while the Strategic Petroleum Reserve declined 9.1 million barrels to 365.1 million, EIA data show.
The cross-asset stakes for the second half
The combination of supply tightness and demand sensitivity creates a narrow path for oil prices. Goldman sees two-sided risk: weaker demand could push Brent below its $90 fourth-quarter forecast by about $10, while persistent Middle East supply losses remain a significant upside risk. The Strait of Hormuz handles about 21% of global oil trade, and flows remain constrained even as the U.S. circulates a draft peace agreement with Iran.
For the Federal Reserve, the Solomon warning adds a new variable to an already uncertain inflation outlook. JPMorgan Chase Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon said May 29 that inflation can "easily hit" 4% this year, which would push bond yields higher and pressure equity valuations. If oil-driven inflation accelerates consumer spending pullback, the Fed faces a stagflationary scenario — rising prices alongside weakening demand — that complicates any rate path.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.