Former Trump economist Joe Lavorgna argues the Federal Reserve must raise rates by a full percentage point as inflation remains entrenched above its 2% target.
Former Trump economist Joe Lavorgna argues the Federal Reserve must raise rates by a full percentage point as inflation remains entrenched above its 2% target.

Former Trump economist Joe Lavorgna argues the Federal Reserve must raise rates by a full percentage point as inflation remains entrenched above its 2% target.
The Federal Reserve faces renewed pressure to tighten after April's personal consumption expenditures price index showed inflation running at 3.8%, reinforcing calls from former Trump economist Joe Lavorgna for a 100-basis-point rate hike.
"The inflation data reinforces the need for the Fed to hike by 100 basis points," Lavorgna, managing director and chief economist at SMBC Americas and former counselor to Treasury Secretary Bessent, said Thursday on CNBC's "Fast Money."
The April PCE report showed headline inflation rising 0.4% from March and 3.8% from a year earlier, matching estimates but remaining well above the central bank's 2% target. Core PCE, which excludes food and energy, increased 0.2% month over month and 3.3% annually — with both monthly readings coming in 0.1 percentage point below consensus projections. Housing and utilities costs climbed 0.6% in April, the largest monthly gain in a year, while energy prices surged as the Iran conflict disrupted supply.
A 100-basis-point hike would represent the most aggressive single move of the current tightening cycle and upend market expectations. Federal funds futures price a 99% probability that new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh will hold rates steady at the June meeting, with the first quarter-point increase not expected until March 2027.
The call for aggressive tightening comes as Warsh navigates his first inflation reports since taking over as Fed chair earlier this year. During his confirmation process, Warsh had expressed openness to rate cuts, making the policy trajectory under his leadership a key question for markets. The April PCE represents the first major inflation reading of his tenure, and how he interprets the data will set the tone for monetary policy through the remainder of 2026.
The divergence between Lavorgna's hawkish view and market pricing highlights the uncertainty surrounding the policy path. While monthly PCE readings came in slightly below forecasts — offering some relief to dovish policymakers who argue the Fed should maintain its wait-and-see approach — year-over-year figures remain stubbornly elevated. The CPI, which tends to run about 40 basis points higher than the PCE, also posted an April headline of 3.8%, reinforcing the narrative that inflation is proving difficult to extinguish.
The last time the Fed confronted inflation at these levels was in 2022-2023, when it delivered 525 basis points of tightening over 16 months. That cycle ended with the fed funds rate at 5.25% to 5.50%, where it remained through the transition to Warsh's leadership. If Lavorgna's call materializes, the fed funds rate would rise to 6.25% to 6.50% — a level not seen since early 2001.
For bond markets, a 100-basis-point hike would trigger a sharp repricing. The 2-year Treasury yield, which is most sensitive to Fed policy expectations, would likely surge, while the yield curve could invert further as long-term growth expectations remain subdued. A stronger dollar would follow, putting pressure on emerging-market currencies and risk assets including equities. The S&P 500 would face headwinds from higher discount rates, while rate-sensitive sectors such as real estate and utilities would likely underperform.
The key question for investors is whether Lavorgna represents a fringe view or the beginning of a broader shift in consensus. With Warsh yet to deliver his first formal policy statement as chair, the market is operating on assumptions that may prove outdated if inflation data continues to run hot. The next test comes with the May CPI release in mid-June, followed by the Fed's rate decision on June 17-18.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.